The significance of educational level in acquiring good literacy of COVID-19: a case study in Indonesia

Background. Surveys on Public Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (PKAP) have been conducted in various countries with respondents from the public as well as health workers. Measuring the knowledge of the public about COVID-19 is very important to determine the knowledge gap among the public and also as an evaluation of the preventive efforts for COVID-19. Objective. The purpose of this research was to determine whether education level is a factor that affects one's literacy about COVID-19. Materials and Methods. This is cross-sectional research with online-based data collection using the Kobo toolbox application. The data collection was carried out from the 19th of April until the 2nd of May 2020. The number of people under study is 792. The level of knowledge was measured using 12 research questions with true or false question types. the multivariable logistic regression was carried out. Results. Most of the respondents (52.5%) were in the young age group (15-35 years old), were male (57.3%), and had a bache-lor or diploma education level (62.1%). Furthermore, most of the respondents had good knowledge (65.4%). The higher the respon-dents' educational level means, the better knowledge they had concerning COVID-19 (P=0.013). Conclusions. Public knowledge about COVID-19 is affected by their level of education. A good level of knowledge about COVID-19 was found among respondents with master's and doctoral degrees. This finding can contribute to the prevention of COVID-19, in which the priority of educating communities about COVID-19 should be given to those having an educational level below a master's degree.Copyright © the Author(s), 2023.

Validating saliva as a biological sample for cost-effective, rapid and routine screening for SARS-CoV-2

Purpose: Compared to nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs (N/OPS-VTM), non-invasive saliva samples have enormous potential for scalability and routine population screening of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we investigate the efficacy of saliva samples relative to N/OPS-VTM for use as a direct source for RT-PCR based SARS-CoV-2 detection. Method(s): We collected paired nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs and saliva samples from suspected positive SARS-CoV-2 patients and tested using RT-PCR. We used generalized linear models to investigate factors that explain result agreement. Further, we used simulations to evaluate the effectiveness of saliva-based screening in restricting the spread of infection in a large campus such as an educational institution. Result(s): We observed a 75.4% agreement between saliva and N/OPS-VTM, that increased drastically to 83% in samples stored for less than three days. Such samples processed within two days of collection showed 74.5% test sensitivity. Our simulations suggest that a test with 75% sensitivity, but high daily capacity can be very effective in limiting the size of infection clusters in a workspace. Guided by these results, we successfully implemented a saliva-based screening in the Bangalore Life Sciences Cluster (BLiSC) campus. Conclusion(s): These results suggest that saliva may be a viable alternate source for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance if samples are processed immediately. Although saliva shows slightly lower sensitivity levels when compared to N/OPS-VTM, saliva collection is logistically advantageous. We strongly recommend the implementation of saliva-based screening strategies for large workplaces and in schools, as well as for population-level screening and routine surveillance as we learn to live with the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Copyright © 2023 Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists

Antibody- and aptamer-free SERS substrate for ultrasensitive and anti-interference detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in untreated saliva.

Sensitive and anti-interference detection of targeted signal(s) in body fluids is one of the paramount tasks in biosensing. Overcoming the complication and high cost of antibody/aptamer-modification, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) based on antibody/aptamer-free (AAF) substrates has shown great promise, yet with rather limited detection sensitivity. Herein, we report ultrasensitive and anti-interference detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in untreated saliva by an AAF SERS substrate, applying the evanescent field induced by the high-order waveguide modes of well-defined nanorods for SERS for the first time. A detection limit of 3.6 × 10-17 M and 1.6 × 10-16 M are obtained in phosphate buffered saline and untreated saliva, respectively; the detection limits are three orders of magnitude improved than the best records from AAF substrates. This work unlocks an exciting path to design AAF SERS substrates for ultrasensitive biosensing, not limited to detection of viral antigens.

HOCl Rapidly Kills Corona, Flu, and Herpes to Prevent Aerosol Spread.

The COVID-19 pandemic has escalated the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the dental practice, especially as droplet-aerosol particles are generated by high-speed instruments. This has heightened awareness of other orally transmitted viruses, including influenza and herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV1), which are capable of threatening life and impairing health. While current disinfection procedures commonly use surface wipe-downs to reduce viral transmission, they are not fully effective. Consequently, this provides the opportunity for a spectrum of emitted viruses to reside airborne for hours and upon surfaces for days. The objective of this study was to develop an experimental platform to identify a safe and effective virucide with the ability to rapidly destroy oral viruses transported within droplets and aerosols. Our test method employed mixing viruses and virucides in a fine-mist bottle atomizer to mimic the generation of oral droplet-aerosols. The results revealed that human betacoronavirus OC43 (related to SARS-CoV-2), human influenza virus (H1N1), and HSV1 from atomizer-produced droplet-aerosols were each fully destroyed by only 100 ppm of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) within 30 s, which was the shortest time point of exposure to the virucide. Importantly, 100 ppm HOCl introduced into the oral cavity is known to be safe for humans. In conclusion, this frontline approach establishes the potential of using 100 ppm HOCl in waterlines to continuously irrigate the oral cavity during dental procedures to expeditiously destroy harmful viruses transmitted within aerosols and droplets to protect practitioners, staff, and other patients.

Comparison between Nasopharyngeal and Saliva Samples for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Children with Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of salivary swabs (SS) to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been implemented and widely studied in adults and children. However, the role of SS in detecting other common respiratory viruses in children is poorly investigated. METHODS: Children younger than 18 years of age admitted with respiratory signs and symptoms underwent both nasopharyngeal and SS procedures. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of SS were calculated, considering the nasopharyngeal swab result as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients (44 females, 53%) underwent both nasopharyngeal and SS procedures. Overall, the sensitivity of SS was 49.4%. Sensitivity according to different respiratory viruses ranged from 0% to 71.43%, while the specificity ranged from 96% to 100%. Negative predictive value ranged from 68.06% to 98.8%, while positive predictive value ranged from 0 to 100%. SS sensitivity in patients younger than 12 months of age was 39.47%, while in patients older than or equal to 12 months of age it was 57.78%. Patients with negative SS had a significantly lower median age (8.5 months (15.25) vs. 23 months (34), p = 0.001) and a significantly lower quantity of median saliva collected for salivary analysis (0 µL (213) vs. 300 µL (100), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SS has a relatively low sensitivity in detecting common respiratory viruses in children with LRTI, with a lower probability in younger children (and in particular those younger than 6 months of age) or those from whom we have collected lesser amounts of saliva. New strategies to improve saliva collection are needed for testing on a larger study population.

SERS Signature of SARS-CoV-2 in Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swabs: Towards Perspective COVID-19 Point-of-Care Diagnostics.

In this study, the intrinsic surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)-based approach coupled with chemometric analysis was adopted to establish the biochemical fingerprint of SARS-CoV-2 infected human fluids: saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs. The numerical methods, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and support vector machine classification (SVMC), facilitated the spectroscopic identification of the viral-specific molecules, molecular changes, and distinct physiological signatures of pathetically altered fluids. Next, we developed the reliable classification model for fast identification and differentiation of negative CoV(-) and positive CoV(+) groups. The PLS-DA calibration model was described by a great statistical value-RMSEC and RMSECV below 0.3 and R2cal at the level of ~0.7 for both type of body fluids. The calculated diagnostic parameters for SVMC and PLS-DA at the stage of preparation of calibration model and classification of external samples simulating real diagnostic conditions evinced high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for saliva specimens. Here, we outlined the significant role of neopterin as the biomarker in the prediction of COVID-19 infection from nasopharyngeal swab. We also observed the increased content of nucleic acids of DNA/RNA and proteins such as ferritin as well as specific immunoglobulins. The developed SERS for SARS-CoV-2 approach allows: (i) fast, simple and non-invasive collection of analyzed specimens; (ii) fast response with the time of analysis below 15 min, and (iii) sensitive and reliable SERS-based screening of COVID-19 disease.

Copper-free click chemistry assisted antibodies for immunodetection of interleukin-10 in saliva

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an anti-inflammatory cytokine that is secreted in response to an acute phase inflammation in patients who are suffering from heart failure (HF). The aim of this work was to develop an electrochemical biosensor for determining salivary IL-10 levels. Biofunctionalization strategy was improved through the use of copper-free click chemistry for the developed sensor due to its advantages, leading to high quantitative yields of stable triazoles, rapid reaction, no cytotoxic Cu(I) catalyst requirement, and high specificity of cyclooctynes toward azides. The approach involved in binding of dibenzocyclooctyne acid (DBCO-COOH) to thiol-azide assembled gold microelectrodes, later capturing the monoclonal IL-10 antibody (IL-10 mAb), and ultimately allowing direct detection of IL-10 antigen. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and nanoplotter associated with fluorescence microscopy methods have been employed to analyze and prove the biofunctionalization of the gold microelectrodes. Moreover, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) technique was used for detecting IL-10 antigen. The developed immunosensor showed a semi-logarithmic linear range, from 0.1 pg/mL to 5 pg/mL with R2 = 0.9815 and a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.1 pg/mL with relative standard deviation (RSD) of 10.67%. The specificity of the immunosensor was evaluated using an inflammatory cytokine, and none of it generated detectable EIS signals. Finally, the successful analysis of saliva samples from a healthy volunteer without Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection demonstrated the usefulness of the developed immunosensor.

COVID-19 impedimetric biosensor based on polypyrrole nanotubes, nickel hydroxide and VHH antibody fragment: specific, sensitive, and rapid viral detection in saliva samples.

SARS-CoV-2 rapid spread required urgent, accurate, and prompt diagnosis to control the virus dissemination and pandemic management. Several sensors were developed using different biorecognition elements to obtain high specificity and sensitivity. However, the task to achieve these parameters in combination with fast detection, simplicity, and portability to identify the biorecognition element even in low concentration remains a challenge. Therefore, we developed an electrochemical biosensor based on polypyrrole nanotubes coupled via Ni(OH)2 ligation to an engineered antigen-binding fragment of heavy chain-only antibodies (VHH) termed Sb#15. Herein we report Sb#15-His6 expression, purification, and characterization of its interaction with the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 in addition to the construction and validation of a biosensor. The recombinant Sb#15 is correctly folded and interacts with the RBD with a dissociation constant (KD) of 27.1 ± 6.4 nmol/L. The biosensing platform was developed using polypyrrole nanotubes and Ni(OH)2, which can properly orientate the immobilization of Sb#15-His6 at the electrode surface through His-tag interaction for the sensitive SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection. The quantification limit was determined as 0.01 pg/mL using recombinant RBD, which was expressively lower than commercial monoclonal antibodies. In pre-characterized saliva, both Omicron and Delta SARS-CoV-2 were accurately detected only in positive samples, meeting all the requirements recommended by the World Health Organization for in vitro diagnostics. A low sample volume of saliva is needed to perform the detection, providing results within 15 min without further sample preparations. In summary, a new perspective allying recombinant VHHs with biosensor development and real sample detection was explored, addressing the need for accurate, rapid, and sensitive biosensors.

Direct comparison of clinical diagnostic sensitivity of saliva from buccal swabs versus combined oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: While current guidelines recommend the use of respiratory tract specimens for the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, saliva has recently been suggested as preferred sample type for the sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron). By comparing saliva collected using buccal swabs and oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs from patients hospitalized due to COVID-19, we aimed at identifying potential differences in virus detection sensitivity between these sample types. METHODS: We compare the clinical diagnostic sensitivity of paired buccal swabs and combined oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs from hospitalized, symptomatic COVID-19 patients collected at median six days after symptom onset by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antigen test. RESULTS: Of the tested SARS-CoV-2 positive sample pairs, 55.8% were identified as SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and 44.2% as Omicron BA.2. Real-time PCR from buccal swabs generated significantly higher quantification cycle (Cq) values compared to those from matched combined oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs and resulted in an increased number of false-negative PCR results. Reduced diagnostic sensitivity of buccal swabs by real-time PCR was observed already at day one after symptom onset. Similarly, antigen test detection rates were reduced in buccal swabs compared to combined oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest reduced clinical diagnostic sensitivity of saliva collected using buccal swabs when compared to combined oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in symptomatic individuals.

Feasibility and Acceptability of Self-Collected Rapid Antigen Tests in the Community and at Home

Intro: Uptake of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (RATs) for self-testing has been high following authorisation by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). However, there are no published Australian data assessing feasibility and compliance with home-based rapid antigen testing. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability of daily rapid antigen self-testing. Method(s): We prospectively recruited a cohort of hospital employees and students from primary and secondary school to perform daily self-testing using RATs in the home over 14 consecutive days. Participants consenting to the study were supplied with 15 Roche SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Nasal Self Tests, 3 saliva swabs for self-collection for RT-PCR and were asked to record results and answer a daily survey using a smartphone application. Finding(s): 38% (26/68) of the cohort were compliant to 14 consecutive days of testing;this was significantly higher in students (71%) than hospital employees (28%). The median number of tests performed over 14 consecutive days was 11 and time to first missed test was a median 5.5 days. The most common reasons for missing days were "I forgot" (37.5%) and "too busy" (8.9%). Ease of self- nasal swabbing, self-nasal testing. performing the test and using the app were rated as comfortable/very comfortable in over 80% of the cohort. Discussion(s): Most study participants in this Australian cohort were compliant with frequent home-based RATs. By study end most participants (93.8%) found the testing process acceptable/very acceptable. There is need for further work on the cost-effectiveness and impact of self-tested RATs under a range of specific uses and conditions. Conclusion(s): This study provided valuable information on acceptability and feasibility of regular home-based testing which could be applied to other diseases. Ongoing community engagement with clear information on RATs including accuracy and use cases is important for decision-making and addressing concerns, particularly for linguistically diverse peoples.Copyright © 2023

*Artificial saliva aerosol source and detection system for spreading analysis in indoor environments

In the context of the Corona pandemic the investigation of aerosol spreading is utmost important as the virus is transported by the aerosol particles exhaled by an infected person. Thus, a new aerosol generation and detection system is set up and validated. The system consists of an aerosol source generating a particle size distribution mimicking typical human exhalation with particles sizes between 0.3-2.5 µm and an array of Sensirion SPS30 particulate matter sensors. An accuracy assessment of the SPS30 sensors is conducted using a TSI OPS3330, a high-precision optical particle sizer. Low deviations of ±5 % of the particle concentration measured with the SPS30 with respect to the OPS are reported for concentrations below 2'500/cm3 and +10% for particle densities up to 25'000/cm3. As an application example the system is employed in a short distance single-aisle research aircraft Dornier 728 (Do728) located at DLR Göttingen, to investigate the large-scale aerosol-spreading. With this measurement system spreading distance from an index passenger extending one seat row to the front and two seat rows to the back is determined. © 2022 17th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, INDOOR AIR 2022. All rights reserved.

Recent advances in RNA sample preparation techniques for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva and gargle.

Molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in gargle and saliva complements the standard analysis of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) specimens. Although gargle and saliva specimens can be readily obtained non-invasively, appropriate collection and processing of gargle and saliva specimens are critical to the accuracy and sensitivity of the overall analytical method. This review highlights challenges and recent advances in the treatment of gargle and saliva samples for subsequent analysis using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and isothermal amplification techniques. Important considerations include appropriate collection of gargle and saliva samples, on-site inactivation of viruses in the sample, preservation of viral RNA, extraction and concentration of viral RNA, removal of substances that inhibit nucleic acid amplification reactions, and the compatibility of sample treatment protocols with the subsequent nucleic acid amplification and detection techniques. The principles and approaches discussed in this review are applicable to molecular detection of other microbial pathogens.

SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection by saliva; an alternative to nasopharyngeal specimen: A cross-sectional study.

Background and Aims: Saliva samples are less invasive and more convenient for patients than naso- and/or oropharynx swabs (NOS). However, there is no US Food and Drug Administration-approved severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rapid antigen test kit, which can be useful in a prolonged pandemic to reduce transmission by allowing suspected individuals to self-sampling. We evaluated the performances of High sensitive AQ+ Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test (AQ+ kit) using nasopharyngeal swabs (NPs) and saliva specimens from the same patients in laboratory conditions. Methods: The real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test result was used for screening the inrolled individuals and compared as the gold standard. NP and saliva samples were collected from 100 rRT-PCR positives and 100 negative individuals and tested with an AQ+ kit. Results: The AQ+ kit showed good performances in both NP and saliva samples with an overall accuracy of 98.5% and 94.0%, and sensitivity of 97.0% and 88.0%, respectively. In both cases, specificity was 100%. AQ+ kit performance with saliva was in the range of the World Health Organization recommended value. Conclusion: xOur findings indicate that the saliva specimen can be used as an alternative and less invasive to NPs for quick and reliable SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection.

SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR Ct values in saliva and nasopharyngeal swab samples for disease severity prediction.

Background: Comparison of clinical value of RT-qPCR-based SARS-CoV-2 tests performed on saliva samples (SSs) and nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPSs) for prediction of the COVID-19 disease severity. Methods: Three paired SSs and NPSs collected every 3 days from 100 hospitalised COVID-19 patients during 2020 Jul-2021 Jan were tested by RT-qPCR for the original SARS-CoV-2 virus and compared to 150 healthy controls. Cases were divided into mild+moderate (Cohort I, N = 47) and severe disease (Cohort II, N = 53) cohorts and compared. Results: SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 65% (91/140) vs. 53% (82/156) of NPSs and 49% (68/139) vs. 48% (75/157) of SSs collected from Cohort I and II, respectively, resulting in the total respective detection rates of 58% (173/296) vs. 48% (143/296) (P = 0.017). Ct values of SSs were lower than those of NPSs (mean Ct = 28.01 vs. 30.07, P = 0.002). Although Ct values of the first SSs were significantly lower in Cohort I than in Cohort II (P = 0.04), it became negative earlier (mean 11.7 vs. 14.8 days, P = 0.005). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that Ct value ≤30 from SSs was the independent predictor for severe COVID-19 (HR = 10.06, 95% CI: 1.84-55.14, P = 0.008). Conclusion: Salivary RT-qPCR testing is suitable for SARS-CoV-2 infection control, while simple measurement of Ct values can assist in prediction of COVID-19 severity.

BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine-Induced Immune Response in Oral Fluids and Serum.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 vaccine is currently being administered worldwide to address the ongoing pandemic. Although these vaccines have proven effective in preventing severe disease, the level of immunity required to prevent respiratory mucosal infection remains less well understood. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a noninvasive screening strategy such as oral fluid to monitor secreted antibodies longitudinally as potential surrogates of mucosal immunity. METHODS: We evaluated the anti-spike protein antibodies in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and saliva and compared them to immune responses in the blood of 50 healthy health care workers following 2 doses of intramuscular Pfizer/BioNTech-BNT162b2 vaccine. RESULTS: The antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike and subdomain proteins (RBD, S1, S2, and NTD) were significantly higher in serum than oral fluids but showed a greater detection rate and higher median titres in GCF than saliva. For all tested SARS-CoV-2 antigens, IgG in GCF (as opposed to saliva) showed a more significant and stronger correlation with IgG in serum. Serum-neutralising antibodies (Nab) titres also displayed a significant and stronger correlation with anti-spike protein and their subdomains in GCF than saliva. Interestingly, the time post-second dose of vaccine and sex had a similar influence on IgG in serum and GCF. However, interferon (IFN)-γ-producing T-cell responses showed no association with SARS-Cov-2 IgG antibodies in serum, GCF, or saliva and neutralisation antibodies in serum. The correlation matrix of all measured parameters grouped serum and GCF IgG parameters separately from salivary IgG parameters indicating that GCF better represents the humoural response in serum than saliva. CONCLUSIONS: Within limitations, we propose that GCF could be a less invasive alternative to serum and more appropriate than saliva to detect antibody responses by current COVID-19 vaccines if the GCF collection procedure could be standardised. Further research is needed to investigate the suitability of GCF for community immune surveillance for vaccines.

Three Doses of Covid-19 Vaccines in Pwh: Immunogenicity and Effects on Hiv Reservoir

Background: People with HIV (PWH) older than age 55 have an enhanced risk of complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is unclear whether COVID-19 vaccines with a booster are as durable in terms of immunogenicity in this cohort or whether these vaccines can destabilize HIV reservoirs. Method(s): We prospectively studied 91 PWH on cART aged 55 or over (n=91) and 23 age-matched individuals without HIV (control group, CG) who received three doses of COVID-19 vaccines (D1-D3) over 48 weeks. Participants received combinations of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChAdOx1. Of PWH, 42 were immune responders (IR), 20 were non-responders (INR), and 3 had a low-level viremia (LLV). Total and neutralizing Abs to SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) and RBD in sera and saliva, frequency of anti-RBD/NTD memory B cells (spectral flow cytometry), S-specific T cell immunity (IFN-g, IL-2 ELISpot) and HIV reservoirs in peripheral CD4+ T cells (IPDA) were measured. Result(s): No significant differences in vaccine regimens or dosing intervals were observed between PWH and CG. Vaccines elicited equally strong anti-S IgG in PWH vs CG in serum and saliva, and RBD IgG in serum. Serum Abs peaked at 4w after D3. Week 48 serum IgG in PWH vs CG were 916 vs 919 BAU/ mL for S (p=0.624) and 706 vs 752 for RBD (p=0.198), respectively. Week 48 median saliva S IgG: 48.1% AUC of the positive control in PWH vs 95.9% for CG (p=0.384). S IgA: 3.83 vs 20.5 in PWH vs CG (p=0.039). Median neutralizing titers post-D2 were significantly lower in PWH than in CG (NT50 82.9 vs 535, p< 0.001). However, after D3, at 48w, PWH had similar titers as CG: 309 vs 269 (p=0.745), mirroring an increase in RBD/NTD-specific B cells in PWH. Anti-S T cell cytokine responses were stronger in IR PWH after D2 and D3 than in CG. Week 48 S IL-2 responses: median 135 SFC/106 PBMC vs 43.8 (p< 0.001), but only 12.5 in INR (p=0.001 vs IR). COVID-19 vaccines did not affect the size of HIV reservoir in PWH (change in median frequency of intact proviruses from baseline: 95.0 vs 90.9, p=0.952), except in three LLV PWH (mean increase 93.7% at 48w). Conclusion(s): PWH aged 55 and over show diminished neutralizing Ab responses to SARS-CoV-2 with two vaccine doses which are 'rescued' after a booster. PWH have lower S-specific IgA in saliva after vaccination which may affect protection. Enhanced S-specific T cell immunity in PWH suggests Th1 imprinting from preexistent HIV infection. COVID-19 vaccines did not destabilize the HIV reservoir in most PWH but may pose potential risk in unsuppressed viremia.

A PHASE 1B STUDY OF ZOTATIFIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE COVID (PROpel)

Background: Zotatifin (eFT226) is a potent and selective inhibitor of eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A), a host RNA helicase required for SARS-CoV-2 replication. In vitro, zotatifin demonstrates broad spectrum antiviral activity against all human coronaviruses tested. Zotatifin has physicochemical and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties suitable for convenient, single subcutaneous (sc) injection. This study assessed the safety, antiviral activity, and PK of zotatifin in non-hospitalized patients (pts) with mild/moderate COVID. Method(s): PROPEL is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in non-hospitalized pts with mild/moderate COVID. At randomization, pts must have had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test within 7 days and at least 1 COVID symptom. Pts were randomized (3:1) to zotatifin or placebo sc in 3 cohorts of 12 pts each. Cohort 1, 2 and 3 received a single dose (SD) of zotatifin of 0.01. 0.02 and 0.035 mg/kg or matching placebo. Safety (adverse event (AE) and laboratory tests), antiviral activity (mid-turbinate nasal swabs and saliva), and plasma PK were collected over 30 days. The primary endpoint was safety;key secondary endpoints included SARS-CoV-2 viral load (VL) and PK. The study was not powered for statistical inferential testing. Result(s): 36 pts were enrolled across all three cohorts and completed a 30-day follow up. Data is currently available for pts in cohorts 1 and 2, 18 and 6 of whom received zotatifin and placebo, respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The most common AE was erythema at injection site in cohort 1 (44%) and cohort 2 (89%), vs. 0% in the zotatifin and pooled placebo groups, respectively. Other AE frequencies were comparable between zotatifin and placebo and no serious AEs were reported. The concentrationtime profile of zotatifin from cohorts 1 and 2 following sc administration was similar to that reported previously following IV administration, demonstrated a terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of ~ 4 days, high steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) of 31 L/kg, and low plasma clearance (Cl) of 3.9 mL/min/kg. A faster time to viral RNA undetectability was observed with zotatifin vs. placebo (see Fig 1. Not statistically significant). Conclusion(s): Zotatifin was safe, well tolerated and demonstrated a trend in clinical antiviral activity in patients with mild to moderate COVID which supports further clinical development. Zotatifin sc route of administration supports a point of care treatment for COVID.

Prolonged Viable Viral Shedding in Immunocompromised Patients with Covid-19

Background: Immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 tend to shed viable virus for a prolonged period. Therefore, for moderately or severely immunocompromised patients with COVID-19, CDC recommends an isolation period of at least 20 days and ending isolation in conjunction with serial testing and consultation with an infectious disease specialist. However, data on viral kinetics and risk factors for prolonged viral shedding in these patients are limited. Method(s): From February 1, 2022 to April 1, 2022, we collected weekly saliva samples from immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Genomic and subgenomic RNAs were measured, and virus culture was performed. Result(s): A total of 41 patients were enrolled;29 (70%) were receiving chemotherapy against hematologic malignancies and the remaining 12 (30%) had undergone solid organ transplantation. Of the 41 patients, 14 (34%) had received 3 doses or more of COVID-19 vaccines. Real-time RT-PCR revealed that 7 (17%) were infected with Omicron BA.1, and 33 (80%) with Omicron BA.2. The median duration of viable virus shedding was 4 weeks (IQR 3-6). Patients undergoing B-cell depleting therapy shed viable virus for longer than the comparator (p=0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that 3-dose or more vaccination (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12 - 0.93, p = 0.04) and B-cell depleting therapy (HR 12.50, 95% CI 2.44 - 100.00, p = 0.003) independently affected viable virus shedding of SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion(s): Immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 shed viable virus for median 4 weeks. B-cell depleting therapy increases the risk of prolonged viable viral shedding, while completion of a primary vaccine series reduces this risk. Overall distribution of samples according to genomic viral copy number and culture positivity. Red dot indicates positive culture results, whereas blue dot indicated negative culture results. (Figure Presented).

Saliva effect on RT-PCR performance

The use of saliva directly in RT-PCR reactions may be interesting, particularly in screenings for the detection of DNA/RNA of pathogens, due to the advantages of time and costs. However, its use faces some difficulties that essentially result from the saliva being a matrix with a variable composition and which contains inhibitors of the polymerization reaction. Saliva samples obtained from healthy donors were spiked with SARS-CoV-2 RNA and 3 viral targets were detected by RT-PCR. This work was considered exempt from review by an institutional ethical review board, because it comprises use of completely anonymized specimens obtained voluntarily and informed. The efficiency of RT-PCR reactions was calculated in the presence of variable amounts of saliva and the effect of saliva pre-treatment on the performance of each reaction was also analysed. It was found that saliva has no significant influence on the mean efficiency of each individual reaction, affecting mainly the beginning of the exponential phase of amplification, resulting in a significant increase in Ct values. This effect which is target dependent, presents a highly between-person variability (DELTACt = 0.93 to 11.36) and affects RNA/DNA detection and the limit-of-detection, but can be partly reversed by a treatment of saliva prior to the reaction. The work presented contributes to a better understanding of the advantages and limitations of using saliva directly in RT-PCR. This work was supported by ProjectNORTE-01-0145- FEDER-072545- SAICTCOVID/72545/2020 and was the result of the projects: UIDB/05937/2020 and UIDP/05937/2020- Centre for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability-funded by national funds, through FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia.Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.